Case studies

UPI and the rise of instant payment systems: what India, Brazil and Europe built

Case studies · Published 2026-09-29

Baskets of potatoes, tomatoes and green beans piled on a market stall
A vegetable stall in Ooty municipal market, Tamil Nadu, the kind of small merchant instant payments reach. Photo: Timothy A. Gonsalves, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Instant payment systems, where money moves between accounts at different institutions in seconds, at any hour, have become the most visible form of digital public infrastructure. India's Unified Payments Interface (UPI) is the largest by number of transactions; Brazil's Pix showed that a central bank can drive adoption at speed; and the European Union has turned instant euro transfers into a legal obligation for banks.

UPI in brief

UPI was launched in 2016 by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), a not-for-profit company set up in 2008 by banks at the initiative of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Indian Banks' Association, and overseen by the RBI. It sits on top of India's existing real-time bank transfer infrastructure and adds three things:

Later additions extended UPI to feature phones (UPI 123PAY, 2022), small offline-friendly payments (UPI Lite, 2022), and credit lines and RuPay credit cards linked to UPI.

Scale, as published

NPCI publishes monthly statistics on its UPI product statistics page. According to press coverage of those figures, UPI processed about 21.6 billion transactions in December 2025, and roughly 228 billion transactions over calendar year 2025, compared with about 172 billion in 2024. These are counts of transactions, not of users or of economic value created; we discuss why that distinction matters in measuring DPI impact.

Why it grew

Several factors are commonly cited, and they are hard to disentangle:

Brazil's Pix and the central bank model

Pix, launched in November 2020, is owned and operated by the Banco Central do Brasil. Participation is mandatory for larger financial institutions, and Pix supports aliases ("chaves Pix" such as a phone number, email or tax number), QR codes and payments between people, businesses and government. Where UPI is run by a bank-owned not-for-profit under central bank oversight, Pix shows the option of the central bank itself running the rails. See the Banco Central do Brasil's Pix page.

Europe: instant payments by regulation

The EU took a regulatory route. Regulation (EU) 2024/886 on instant credit transfers in euro entered into force in April 2024. It required payment service providers in the euro area to be able to receive instant euro transfers by 9 January 2025 and to send them by 9 October 2025, at a price no higher than standard transfers. It also requires a verification of payee service that checks whether the name of the payee matches the account number before a payment is sent, for instant and standard transfers alike. Later deadlines apply to institutions outside the euro area and to payment and e-money institutions. The text is on EUR-Lex.

Europe's approach makes instant transfers universal at the account level, but it does not by itself create a common consumer front end like UPI apps or Pix keys; that layer is left to banks and private schemes.

Three models compared

UPI (India)Pix (Brazil)EU instant payments
Launched2016November 2020SCT Inst scheme from 2017; mandatory under Regulation 2024/886
OperatorNPCI, bank-owned not-for-profit, overseen by RBICentral bankExisting clearing systems; rules set by EU law
Third-party appsYes, licensed providersThrough participating institutionsDepends on banks and schemes
AliasesVirtual payment addresses, phone numbersPix keysNot harmonised; verification of payee required
Merchant feesZero by law for most UPI paymentsSet by participants; free for individualsNo higher than standard transfers

Open questions

Concentration on neutral rails

UPI's rails are open, but a few third-party apps account for most transactions. NPCI proposed a cap on any single app's share of volume in 2020; the compliance deadline has been postponed several times. The case illustrates a broader point in our design principles: neutral infrastructure does not guarantee a competitive market on top of it.

Who pays for the rails?

Zero merchant fees helped adoption, but someone pays for processing, fraud prevention and innovation. The balance between public subsidy, bank revenues and future fees is a live policy debate in India.

Fraud and scams

Instant and irrevocable payments are attractive to fraudsters, especially "authorised push payment" scams where victims are tricked into sending money. Verification of payee in the EU and transaction limits, alerts and cooling-off features elsewhere are partial answers.

Cross-border links

Bilateral links, such as UPI with Singapore's PayNow (February 2023), are growing. The BIS Innovation Hub's Project Nexus has explored a multilateral model for connecting domestic fast payment systems instead of building one-to-one links. See our Singapore case study.

Sources